I did a search for Marks and Spencer’s this morning and noticed that there was a new google “search Marksandspencer.com” button there so I popped “Flowers” in there and clicked search.
The results were displayed on Google as usual but it had done a site search on Marks and Spencers for me, which is fine from a user point of view, it saved me having to to to Marks and Spencers and then search for flowers.

From a webmaster point of view this is bad news though and will result in traffic loss in my opinion as the user hits Google with your brand / site in mind and is then given another chance to click a competing advert or brand and go elsewhere although on the plus side perhaps conversion will be increased as users may find what they seek on your site more easily (if Google has been able to index it properly), I guess only time will tell for sure.
Normally after doing a search for M&S I’d have clicked the link for their site and gone there when the results were presented, and being exposed to their site and offers etc. and M&S would have every opportunity to market their wares to me but with this embedded site search I didn’t, I entered Flowers and clicked search, I was then exposed to three headline AdWords ads and the full right hand side for other sites selling flowers.

All those nice ads are being displayed when the user would most likely be on the Marks and Spencer site itself if the embedded site search option wasn’t there to use, so Google are benefiting from brand traffic by showing ads, nice step for them, I can imagine there being millions of extra page views each month if this becomes a permanent feature.
If you look at AdWords listing number 3 you’ll see it’s Marks and Spencer flowers, I wonder how many people would click that listing, even if only 10% then Google has just monetised traffic that would have been free for M&S if the search box wasn’t there.
It’s a positive step for other advertisers as there will be more traffic looking for specific products, albeit on someone else’s site initially, but it’s at a cost to the site owner who’s had the embedded search button used on them, in lost traffic and sales on their organic brand and URL traffic.
I can’t say as I’m a fan of this new feature, AdWords is turning into a very brand sensitive arena and here are Google opening up sites brand and URL traffic so they can monetise it and others can benefit in traffic and sales whilst the inital brand searched can lose out.
I wouldn’t object if there were no AdWords and it was purely a site search service but due to Ads being shown on the results this isn’t a win-win situation for those “lucky” enough to get a listing with a site search box under it.

March 5th, 2008 at 10:39 am
Whilst reading through your blog I performed the same searches on google. At first I was thinking, ‘this is good’, until I saw the adwords appearing and thought ‘holy shit!’
It’s a very interesting progression, with pros and cons.
March 6th, 2008 at 12:12 pm
A superb post & a real eye opener. Great for advertisers (depending on CTR) & bad for owners of the big brands ranking organically.
Check this out for Wikipedia
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=wikipedia&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a
March 6th, 2008 at 12:31 pm
[...] - Brand Abuse ? Here is another wikipedia - Google Search and here is Shane’s blog on it RevenueAddict.com
March 7th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
I have seen them now for WHSmith & Woolworths, so it seems the trend is increasing.
March 8th, 2008 at 10:36 am
[...] get squeezed ever harder. G$$gle will do as it sees fit to maximise revenue from it’s traffic, the recent embeded search boxes being one thing to monetise traffic that used to just leave google without earning them a dime, but [...]
March 8th, 2008 at 10:06 pm
[...] of its underbellies, and there are few to be exploited. If you read Shane’s Blog … Google Embedded Site Search - Brand Abuse ? Apart from the valid points on there like a bigger wedge of cash derived from advertisers, and [...]
March 24th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
A day late (ok - 3 weeks) but Silicon Ally Insider just picked up on this:
http://www.alleyinsider.com/...
“Google (GOOG) says it will work to keep competitors’ results off of second pages, at least in some cases.”
Click to alleyinsider, then read the article @ NY Times.
March 27th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
I read somewhere (think it was webmaster world or a google blog) that you can ask for the embeded search (google actually call it teleporting ..lol) to be removed if you are “lucky” enough to be blessed with one but don’t want it.. however you can’t ask for it back if you decide you’d like it later.
April 4th, 2008 at 10:34 am
[...] Fortunately it is listed in on Google (The Web), but then it is subject to Google’s embedded site search … Google Embedded Site Search - Brand Abuse ? [...]